So I shouldn't include Worf's pet tribble Sparky in his article then? Damn. Rendering & Production test of the Oberth Class Bridge for my Star Trek Universe project.Did you like the video, then thumbs up & subscribe to my channel.3D. For us, less is more. -) - TimPendragon 01:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
I think it's a good rule of thumb for just about any canon article. U.S.S Oberth NCC-602 Oberth Class 2 Saved by George F. that was my thinking, and thank God I didn't second guess myself and add the information. :) - usscantabrian 01:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
We only need the bare bones here, which will make fan-created data all the more prominent when its added. If people want to look up information on the Oberth-class, say if they're writing a fic or planning an RPG, then I'm sure they'll look at Memory Alpha. Do we want to include this or not get too in-depth about it? - usscantabrian 01:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)įor this, and most articles on canon subjects, I don't think we should go into great detail at all. Each ship has a attack type and an armor type (some have 2 attack types) which determine what ships it deals a lot of damage against and which ships it takes a lot of damage from.Hi all, there is significantly more information on the Memory Alpha Oberth class article than this one, with information on the bridge, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
